NoeticMap
How can I help?
Ask about NDEs, research, or this page
TL;DR
Atheists and skeptics do report near-death experiences, and their accounts contain the same core elements as those reported by religious experiencers — light, peace, out-of-body perception, encounters with beings, and life reviews. The primary difference lies in interpretation, not content: atheists are less likely to label the being of light as God but describe the same perceptual experience. Many atheist experiencers report significant shifts in their worldview following their NDE.
The data shows that atheists, agnostics, and self-identified skeptics report NDEs with the same core elements as religious experiencers. Across the documented database, prior religious belief does not predict whether a person will have an NDE, nor does it predict which elements will appear. The Greyson Scale scores of atheist experiencers are comparable to those of religious experiencers, indicating the same depth and complexity of experience.
This finding is significant because it directly challenges the hypothesis that NDEs are products of religious expectation. If NDEs were constructed from prior beliefs about the afterlife, atheists and agnostics — who explicitly do not expect an afterlife experience — should either not have NDEs or should have qualitatively different ones. Neither pattern appears in the data.
Atheist NDE experiencers often express surprise and disorientation at having had the experience. Many describe their NDE as conflicting fundamentally with their worldview, creating a cognitive challenge they continue to process for years or decades afterward. Their accounts typically describe the same sequence of events — peace, separation from the body, movement toward light, encounters with beings — but with different interpretive language.
Where a Christian experiencer might describe meeting Jesus, an atheist experiencer encountering the same type of luminous, loving being might describe it as an intelligence, a presence, or a consciousness — without attributing a religious identity. The perceptual content is the same; the label differs. Many atheist experiencers report that their NDE did not make them religious but did make them open to the possibility that consciousness may not be entirely dependent on the brain.
“Up until then, I had been an atheist for years.”
“Before these events, I was a staunch atheist.”
Oleg KNDE
“I silently asked Him what the difference was between religious people, like Christians, and those who didn’t believe, like atheists.”
Kathryn ENDE
“I was an atheist, life had no purpose, I was somewhat depressed.”
Frank G NDENDE
“My early life was very hard and was raised by atheists who were quite abusive, so this gave me an entire new outlook on life and have had hundreds or even thousands of paranormal and even miraculous evens since this happened.”
“At the time, I believed very strongly as an atheist.”
Linda B NDENDE
“I had recently married back in 1948 a beautiful woman by the name of Pat.”
Suicide NDENDE
“Two years earlier, I had been an atheist now I was a Christian and had a Christian home and family.”
Dr. Bruce Greyson's research at the University of Virginia found no correlation between prior religious belief and the likelihood or depth of an NDE. Atheists were as likely to report NDEs as religious believers, and the phenomenological content (measured by the Greyson NDE Scale) was statistically indistinguishable. This finding has been replicated across multiple studies and populations.
Dr. Pim van Lommel's prospective study explicitly examined the relationship between prior religious belief and NDE occurrence among cardiac arrest patients. He found that religiosity was not a predictor of NDEs. Patients who identified as non-religious were as likely to report NDEs as those who were deeply religious.
Dr. Jeffrey Long's analysis of NDERF accounts compared experiences from self-identified atheists and agnostics with those from religious respondents. He found the same core elements at comparable frequencies, with the primary differences appearing in the interpretive language used to describe the experience rather than in the experience itself. Long noted that many atheist experiencers underwent significant worldview changes following their NDE, often shifting toward a spiritual (though not necessarily religious) understanding of reality.
No significant relationship was found between the depth of near-death experience and the various measures of religious orientation and belief.
p Not significant
Sequelae of near-death experiences included changes in attitudes towards God or religion, self, and death
75% for God or religion, 74% for self, 73% for own death, 72% for death in general · n = 78
Three distinct types of near-death experiences were identified: transcendental, affective, and cognitive.
n = 89
Theistic religions reported more NDEs
N/A · n = 25 · p P = 0.0250 · effect size: N/A · CI: N/A
Near-death experience (NDE) is a phase or event that causes changes in attitude, activity, and thinking in life.
Near-death experiences (NDEs) cause a profound reality/identity context shift or 'ontological shift'.
80% · n = 8
The fact that atheists have NDEs with the same content as religious experiencers is a significant data point for scientific theories of NDEs. It argues against the cultural expectation model — the idea that NDEs are constructed from what people expect death to be like — because atheists explicitly expect nothing after death, yet they report the same experience.
From a neuroscience perspective, the consistency of NDEs across belief systems supports the hypothesis that NDEs reflect a universal brain process rather than a culturally constructed narrative. If the same neural mechanisms activate during near-death states regardless of the person's beliefs, the resulting experience should be the same — which is what the data shows. However, this raises its own question: why would the brain produce an experience of light, love, and transcendence during crisis, regardless of the person's expectations?
Some researchers have proposed that the brain has an innate "dying template" — a genetically encoded experience that activates during near-death states, perhaps as an evolutionary mechanism to reduce suffering during dying. This would explain the cross-belief consistency. However, this hypothesis does not explain why the experience includes specific, verifiable content (such as accurate out-of-body perceptions or encounters with people the experiencer did not know had died) that goes beyond what an innate template could produce.
Atheists and skeptics report NDEs with the same core elements (light, peace, beings, life review) as religious experiencers
Prior religious belief does not predict whether a person will have an NDE or which elements it will contain
The primary difference is interpretive: atheists use non-religious language to describe the same perceptual experiences
The consistency of NDEs across all belief systems challenges the cultural expectation hypothesis
Many atheist experiencers report significant worldview shifts — not necessarily toward religion, but toward openness about the nature of consciousness
The cross-belief consistency of NDE content supports the hypothesis that NDEs reflect a universal process rather than a culturally constructed narrative
The information on this page is drawn from Noeticmap's database of 8,940 documented near-death experiences, out-of-body experiences, and related accounts, as well as 6 peer-reviewed academic research papers. Experiences are sourced primarily from NDERF.org, OBERF.org, and ADCRF.org.
Each experience has been analyzed using established research frameworks including the Greyson NDE Scale (a standardized 32-point measure of NDE depth), element detection, and sentiment analysis. We present the data as objectively as possible — the quotes and statistics reflect what experiencers reported, not our interpretations.
Was this article helpful?
Search related experiences
Use semantic search to find more accounts related to this topic
NDEs are reported by people of every religious background studied — Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Sikhs, indigenous practitioners, agnostics, and atheists. The core experience (light, peace, beings, life review) is remarkably consistent across all traditions, though cultural and religious frameworks shape how experiencers interpret and describe what they encountered. This cross-religious consistency is one of the strongest arguments that NDEs reflect a universal phenomenon rather than culturally constructed expectations.
NDEs produce significant belief changes across experiencers of all prior backgrounds. The most common shifts include strengthened conviction in an afterlife, movement away from organized religion toward personal spirituality, increased belief in the interconnectedness of all life, and a broadened conception of the divine. Interestingly, both devoutly religious and firmly atheist experiencers report belief shifts, though in different directions — religious experiencers often become less dogmatic, while atheist experiencers often become open to spiritual realities.
Near-death experiences are among the most well-documented anomalous phenomena in medical literature. Thousands of independent accounts from people of all ages, cultures, and belief systems describe remarkably consistent elements. Whether they represent evidence of consciousness beyond the brain or a complex neurological process remains one of the most debated questions in science.
Get insights from our consciousness research delivered to your inbox. No spam, just meaningful updates.